Capital News Service

of the Michigan State University School of Journalism

Court restores freedom-of-information suit against State Police

By ERIC FREEDMAN
Capital News Service

LANSING – Bill collectors hear the excuse countless times: “The check’s in the mail.”

But when it comes to rejecting freedom of information requests from the public, government agencies must actually mail the letters.

That’s what the Court of Appeal has ruled in reinstating an Ionia County lawsuit against the State Police by a motorist who was told a videotape of her traffic stop didn’t exist.

The controversy stems from a May 2008 incident when a trooper ticketed Nancy Prins’ passenger for failing to wear a seat belt in Boston Township. Prins filed a freedom of information request for the videotape of the traffic stop.

The State Police denied her request, saying that “any in-car video that may have existed is no longer available. Only kept 30 days and reused.”

But when the passenger appeared in court to contest the ticket, however, the prosecutor presented the videotape that the State Police had claimed no longer existed as evidence.

Prins then sued the State Police for violating the freedom of information law.

State law requires public bodies to provide a “full explanation of the reasons for the denial” and to tell requesters about their right to appeal or sue, according to the Attorney General’s office. That requirement includes “notification of the right to receive attorney fees and collect damages.”

Public agencies that fail to comply with the law face possible liability for compensatory damages, punitive damages of $500 and legal fees.

The law sets a 180-day deadline for lawsuits.

A lower-court judge tossed out Prins’ case, saying she waited too long to sue because she started the case 184 days after the State Police wrote its denial letter.

The Court of Appeals disagreed, saying the 180-day clock didn’t start to run until the letter was actually mailed.

“The Legislature intended that the public body undertake an affirmative step reasonably calculated to bring the denial notice to the attention of the requesting party,” Appeals Judge Elizabeth Gleicher said for the unanimous three-member panel.

The decision sends the case back to Ionia County Circuit Court for further proceedings.

 

 

 

About these ads

Filed under: State Agencies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About CNS

CNS reporters cover state government — issues and personalities.



Covering stories of meaning to their member papers, they come in contact with the important newsmakers of the day, from the Supreme Court justices and the governor to members of the Legislature and the people who run the state government departments, to lobbyists and public-interest organizations.



Then they also talk with “real people” — the individual citizens and businesses in communities to get their reactions to what’s happening in Lansing.



In addition to weekly news stories, CNS students write in-depth articles on issues facing state government and their impact on taxpayers.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: