Capital News Service

of the Michigan State University School of Journalism

Rail boosters push for more train service

By LANE BLACKMER
Capital News Service

LANSING—Advocates for better transportation in Michigan say the state needs more federal aid and better planning to accommodate all-time highs in train ridership.

Amtrak reported that its ridership nationwide is higher than ever, at 28.7 million passengers in 2009-10. And President Barack Obama recently proposed $50 billion in federal aid to transportation, including passenger rail service.

Although transportation officials acknowledge that federal money might not be available soon, if ever, Michigan has definite needs.

“With the report, there’s some good concepts,” said Tim Fischer, deputy policy director at the Michigan Environmental Council. “Still, the specifics are what’s important.”

For example, Fischer said, infrastructure banks, or loan programs serving transportation development, are a necessity.

Fischer said Michigan also needs to rev up its efforts with intra-city passenger rail and commuter train systems. An online forum, Michigan By Rail, is attempting to get people to discuss transportation issues, he said.

“We’re asking the question to Michigan citizens: ‘What do you want to see in your rail system?’” he said. “What we’re hearing, uniformly throughout the state, is that people want to see their passenger rails better connected to the rest of the state.”

Fischer said state residents are asking for more direct train routes, but Amtrak has only three lines and 25 stations in Michigan. None of the lines serves Northern Michigan or the Upper Peninsula. They run between Chicago and Grand Rapids, Pontiac and Port Huron.

Improving intrastate travel is number one on the list for John Langdon, governmental affairs director for the Michigan Association of Railway Passengers, who lives in Holland.

“We need to increase the frequency of trains,” said Langdon. “The benefits would be bringing tourism and business to Michigan by rail.”

According to Amtrak, the Pere Marquette train from Chicago reaches its destination at Grand Rapids at 10:20 p.m.

“Business travelers need schedules that would work for their schedule,” Langdon said. “You’d have to spend two nights before you could get any work done.”

Langdon proposes that a train from Chicago arrive in Holland no later than 10 a.m. and in Grand Rapids before noon.

That timeline, he said, would bring more business to the state and allow tourists to jump off and spend a day in Southwest Michigan beach towns, like New Buffalo and St. Joseph.

“The bottom line is, any time Amtrak has increased frequency in any part of the nation, there’s a dramatic increase in ridership,” he said.

He said the New Buffalo station saw a 302 percent increase in passengers after a new station opened nearer to the beach. He attributes a recent uptick to commuters working in Chicago who have settled in the area.

“There’s no question in my mind that we need to at least show commitment so we can prove we should be provided with” more federal
grants, Langdon said.

Larry Karnes, Michigan Department of Transportation freight policy specialist, said a federally mandated state rail plan is in the works and is expected to be finished next June.

“It will identify the issues that are facing people in passenger rail, the needed service and resources available,” he said.

Karnes said Michigan last updated its rail plan in the early 1980s.

The rail passenger system gets a state subsidy, and that money is extremely limited, Karnes said.

“Michigan has been in the bottom 20 percent compared with other states for mass transportation funding for the past 40 years,” said Bill Shreck, communications director at the Michigan Department of Transportation.

Fischer said if public transit is implemented and residents use it rather than drive on roads, the cost of public transportation maintenance might be less than the cost of widening and maintaining highways.

“It’s cheaper to fund public transportation by far than it is to expand highways,” he said. “Those are costs that we as a state have chosen to invest in. Those don’t last forever.”

© 2010, Capital News Service, Michigan State University School of Journalism. Not to be reproduced without permission.

Advertisements

Filed under: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About CNS

CNS reporters cover state government — issues and personalities.



Covering stories of meaning to their member papers, they come in contact with the important newsmakers of the day, from the Supreme Court justices and the governor to members of the Legislature and the people who run the state government departments, to lobbyists and public-interest organizations.



Then they also talk with “real people” — the individual citizens and businesses in communities to get their reactions to what’s happening in Lansing.



In addition to weekly news stories, CNS students write in-depth articles on issues facing state government and their impact on taxpayers.
%d bloggers like this: